DUNBARTON PLANNING BOARD

WEDNESDAY, JULY 18, 2001

TOWN OFFICES – 7:00 P.M.

 

The Dunbarton Planning Board held its regular monthly meeting at the above time, date and place with Chairman James Marcou presiding.  The following members were present:

 

               James Marcou, Chairman

               Kenneth Swayze, Co-Chairman

               Alison R. Vallieres, Secretary

               George Holt

               Carter Higginbotham

               Charles Graybill, Selectman

               Michael Poirier, Alternate

 

               Bruce Vaal, Building Inspector

 

The Chairman verified with the Secretary that the meeting had been posted in a timely fashion at three places throughout the Town and that it had been published in the Concord Monitor for one day.

 

Approval of previous meeting minutes:

 

Kenneth Swayze noted corrections on page 4 of the minutes, paragraph 9, stating as follows:

 

1.      “The applicant indicated he would like to get this approved in one phase” should be corrected to indicate that “The applicant would like to get the subdivision approved in its entirety but would consider phasing.

 

2.      With regard to the site walk scheduled for Friday, June 29, 2001, this site walk was scheduled for the Giovagnoli/VandeBogart/Glannon  Proposed Lot Line Adjustment and not the VanDeBogart Subdivision as noted in the minutes.

 

With these above corrections, the minutes of Wednesday, June 20, 2001 were approved as corrected. 

 

The first item on the agenda, Proposed Lot line Adjustment between Thomas J. Giovagnoli/Jan VanDebogart/David Glannon was postponed for fifteen minutes because the applicant was not yet present. 

 

7:15 p.m. – PUBLIC HEARING -  PROPOSED JAN VANDEBOGART ELEVEN (11) LOT SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON MONTELONA ROAD IN THE LOW DENSITY DISTRICT IN DUNBARTON, NH

 

Jacques Belanger, Surveyor, appeared before the Board on behalf of the applicant.  The applicant was also present. 

 

Jacques Belanger presented a revised plan showing two construction phases, Phase I and Phase II.  He noted he had changed the strip to be conveyed to Giovagnoli to ten feet wide.    He submitted drainage calculation and completed road plans to the Board. 

 

The Board discussed miscellaneous possibilities of phasing with the applicant.  The applicant will consider options and make his decision before the next meeting.. 

 

It was noted by the Board that the building of the fire pond will be included in Phase I because the three lots previously subdivided are considered in the count for the fire pond.  The fire pond will be built to standards set by the Fire Chief. 

 

Carter Higginbotham asked the applicant how he would get to the fire pond in the winter.  The Board noted the access road should be built to Class V standards because they need access to the fire pond. 

The Board indicated the applicant should get a letter from the Fire Department regarding the required design for the fire pond or have the Fire Chief initial the final design of the proposed fire pond. 

 

The Board asked if the applicant had any questions regarding the building permits,  phasing process and bonding of the road.  The Board noted that Old Fort Estates Road had been built all at once. 

 

It was noted that the applicant will be building his own house on the large tract without having to put in the road. 

 

Road plans will be submitted to Don Mayo.

 

Phasing plans were discussed with the applicant.  The applicant stated that he needs to build the first eight in the first phase (which includes the previous three lots) in order to pay for the road.  The applicant was advised to think about the phasing and how it will be done before the next meeting. 

 

The applicant stated that he felt the first three lots of the subdivision should not even be considered a part of this subdivision because that was a Court issue. 

 

George Holt stated the Conservation Commission had done a site walk and the proposed subdivision as presented has the least impact on the wetlands. 

 

Abutters were read as follows and noted all had been notified by certified mail:  

 

David and Deborah Reilly – Not Present

Nassikas Inc. C/O Mrs. John Nassikas – Not Present

Joseph/Diane Richard – Not Present

Baillargeon Family Trust – Not Present

Linda VandeBogart – Not Present

David Glannon – Not Present

Thomas Giovagnoli – Present, no comments.

Karen/Stephen Elasser – Present, no comments.

Brilaw LLC – Not Present

J. E. Belanger Surveying – Present.

 

It was noted that the Board should schedule a site walk of the property before the next meeting. 

Site walk scheduled for Tuesday, August 7, 2001 at 6:00 p.m.

 

The Board noted they would agree to a random sampling of test pits. 

 

There being no further comments from the public, the public hearing was closed. 

 

7:00 p.m. – PUBLIC HEARING – PROPOSED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN THOMAS J. GIOVAGNOLI/JAN VANDEBOGART/DAVID GLANNON ON MORSE ROAD AND TWIST HILL ROAD AND SUBSEQUENT TWO LOT SUBDIVISION OF THOMAS J. GIOVAGNOLI PROPERTY LOCATED ON TWIST HILL ROAD IN THE LOW DENSITY DISTRICT IN DUNBARTON, NH

 

Jacques Belanger, Surveyor, appeared before the Board with the final plan showing the proposed Lot Line Adjustment and Subsequent Subdivision.  The applicant, Thomas Giovagnoli was present. 

 

Jacques stated that the proposal was breaking off a five acre lot from Giovagnoli which includes additional frontage from Glannon on Morse Road which included with the Giovagnoli frontage meets the 300 foot requirement.  The two frontages are adjoined together by a ten foot wide strip of land  which was purchased from Glannon and VanDeBogart. 

 

                              Bruce Vaal, Building Inspector – Asked if there was any plans for the remaining parcel.

 

                              It was indicated that not at this time. 

 

                              At this point in the meeting, George Holt stated he was opposed to this for the following reasons:

 

1.      The strip which adjoins the two parcels for frontage is just as Bob Perry said last meeting, it

Will cause havoc down the line.  Will annoy whoever is living there. 

 

2.      Main argument is that it doesn’t meet our zoning regulations.  This should not be

        approved.

 

3.      Stated the zoning ordinance definition of frontage does not mean frontage that is not

continuous. 

 

               At this point in the meeting, Bruce Vaal asked the applicant if he would consider putting a limitation on the remaining acreage.  The applicant stated he would not.

 

George Holt – Asked the applicant if he had approached his abutters to purchase additional frontage.  The applicant stated there was none available. 

 

At this point in the meeting, Charles Graybill stated that he would be stepping down from this Lot Line Adjustment and the VanDeBogart Subdivision because the applicants both work for him in the Town Office. 

 

Michael Poirier stated he would be stepping down also because he will be involved in construction re the VanDeBogart property. 

 

The Chairman noted the following members would be voting on this Lot Line Adjustment and Subdivision:

 

               James Marcou, Chairman

               Alison Vallieres

               Kenneth Swayze

               George Holt

               Carter Higginbotham

 

At this point in the discussion, Carter Higginbotham stated that he tends to agree with George Holt.  This is not  “pretty” and does not meet the intent of the regulations that have been set down and what happens in the court I don’t feel we can stop.  Regulations need to be clarified in the future. 

 

George Holt – Stated that every subdivision is a “separate animal”.  Each one has different facets.

 

Charles Graybill, Selectman,  noted that precident has been set in the past via the Trexler subdivision, VanDeBogart and others where frontage has not been continuous.  This was established via Town Counsel, etc.

 

At this point, Kenneth Swayze read the RSA definition of frontage to the Board.  George Holt noted that the Town can supercede the State definition. 

 

It was noted for the record that the applicant had come to the Planning Board and asked for advice as how to proceed.  He proceeded on the advice of the Planning Board.    

 

Abutters were read as follows and noted all had been notified by certified mail:

 

Wayne/Jane Chmiel C/O Leo Chmiel – Present, no comment.

Nancy/Robert LeBlanc – Present.  Stated they sold the farm to Giovagnoli.  They wanted to  subdivide but were told there was no way they could because of lack of frontage.  It was supposed to remain as a farm and no further subdivision. 

 

At this point, the Board asked if there was any deed restrictions or conditions on the property.   It was indicated there was no restrictions when sold to Giovagnoli.    Asked if they were going to put a driveway on Twist Hill Road. 

 

It was noted that the driveway will be put on the plan. 

 

At this point in the discussion, the Board noted that the applicant had purchased additional frontage on Morse Road to qualify for the frontage requirement and the proposed subdivision has two lots, each with 300 feet of frontage. 

 

Barbara Anderson Revocable Trust – Present. Stated he had a question about the remainder of the farm. 

 

The Board indicated that in order to further subdivide, they would have to put in a road to Town standards to create frontage, etc. 

 

Karen and Stephen Elasser – Present,  stated the ten foot wide strip can be widened later down the road by adding to it, etc.   Could be used as an access for off road vehicles and snowmobiles. 

 

The intent of the strip is to add frontage to qualify for the 300 foot frontage requirement. 

 

The Board noted there could be a condition added to the plan which states “No further addition or change in the ten foot strip which adjoins the parcels  and the parcel on Morse Road cannot be used as a building lot, etc. “

 

The Board noted that nothing has changed.  The land can be used by the present owners in the same way. 

 

Asked what the applicants plan to do with the property in the future.

 

The Board indicated they don’t have the right to restrict future development. 

 

Karen Elasser stated that the road is dangerous.  This is not common sense that frontage could qualify on another road. 

 

Stephen L. Markievitz – Not Present

 

Daniel and Monique Roux – Not Present

 

Joseph Milano/Linda Aumand – Not Present

 

Wheeler Family Trust – Not Present

 

Linda VandeBogart – Not Present

 

Jan VandeBogart – Present,  stated that all the things people are talking about now will be thrown out the window in the future.  There will be two and three acre lot sizes, and more and more building.  You can’t stop people from building on their property.  Every one of us wants to give land to our children.  Roads are going to be straightened.  No one wants this to happen but it will. 

 

George Holt – Stated the reason we have a zoning ordinance is because people like it this way.  When you have 50% of the Town rural, you want to keep it that way.  More hopeful that we will not see highways and byways. 

 

Dennis Baillargeon 2000 Family Trust – Not Present

 

Joseph Lukska – Not Present

 

David Glannon – Not Present

 

Nathan Narus – Present, stated that he disagrees with the whole thing.  Don’t understand how someone can buy a piece of property and add frontage.  The thing is crazy. 

 

The Board explained that this was an option that the applicant chose instead of building a road to create frontage.

 

Narus asked if the land on Morse Road  could ever be built upon.  The Board noted there would be conditions on the plan stating the parcel  on Morse Road could not be built upon in the future. 

 

At this point, Karen Elasser asked if they could request that a condition be put on the plan that the ten foot strip can never be added to another parcel to create a larger area capable of building a road or otherwise.  The Board indicated this would be an option open to the Board.

 

Stuart/Marjorie Readio – Not Present

 

Robert and Dorothy Perry – Not Present

 

Martha/Anthony  Belanger – Not Present

 

BRILAW – Not Present

 

David and Deborah Reilly – Not Present

 

Nassikas Inc. C/O Mrs. John Nassikas – Not Present

 

Joseph and Diane Richard – Not Present

 

Baillargeon Family Trust – Not Present

 

At this point in the meeting, Leo Chmiel stated he would like to make a comment as follows:

 

Stated the new lot will have seven acres with a private drive.  With additional  land, someday in the future

he may want to develop further. 

 

Barbara Anderson Trust – Asked what the width requirements would be for a Town Road.  The Board indicated a road to Town Standards would have to be 50 feet wide.

 

Nathan Narus – Stated they should have exhausted everything before they split up the lots.

 

Bruce Vaal, Building Inspector – Asked why they did not require the applicant to build a road to Town standards and include it as frontage instead of this configuration. 

 

Jan VandeBogart – Asked if they were trying to stop people from building in this Town. 

 

There being no further comments from the public, the public hearing was closed.

 

7:30 p.m. – PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED TOM AND CAROL HOGAN TWO LOT SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON ROBERT ROGERS ROAD IN THE LOW DENSITY DISTRICT IN DUNBARTON, NH

 

It was noted for the record that the Board now had the full Board as voting members.  Charles Graybill and Michael Poirier stepped back on the Board. 

 

Jacques Belanger, Surveyor, appeared before the Board and stated that the plan had not changed since the first presentation last meeting.  He stated he had included a 15 foot easement along the frontage for road maintenance and improvements. 

 

The wetlands were mapped by Peter Schauer.

 At this point in the discussion, George Holt suggested that the applicant agree to a voluntary limit of cutting of vegetation of 50% of the basal area 75 feet from the wetlands on the property similar to the Shoreline Protection Act.  Stated it was a nice lot.  Driveway was okay and the sight distance was fine.  Was a fairly steep lot.  Possibility of taking of the land for road maintenance on the corner. 

 

Abutters were read as follows and noted all had been notified by certified mail:

 

Thomas and Eleanor Watts – Present,  stated he was concerned about the wetland area down there.  Lot of wetlands and brook that runs through it.  Not sure the drainage is alright.

 

George Holt – Stated that test pits were not done last week on the site walk. 

 

Jacques Belanger stated that Morris Foote had done the test pits and the one on the easterly lot was 7 feet with Gloucester Soil.  The wetlands have been mapped.  The applicant will not have to acquire any wetlands permits.

The west lot test pit had no problems.  The Board noted that Gloucester Soil is a good soil for drainage. 

 

Timothy and Holly Twitchell – Present, Stated there is a spring that runs under the culvert on the east lot where the proposed septic system is shown on the plan.  The Board noted the proposed septic system is ten feet higher than the wetlands area. 

 

Robert and Pamela Syms – Not Present.

 

Helen and Edward Knight – Not Present.

 

Jeffery/Melinda Spill – Present.  Stated the driveway noted for the west lot appears to be directly across from his existing driveway.  Asked where the driveway was in relation to his driveway. 

 

Jacques Belanger stated the proposed driveway is 70 feet from the corner. 

 

Jeffery Spill stated this could be a dangerous situation because he plows his driveway and might be backing out, etc. when the other driveway was being used. 

 

Jacques indicated they would slide the proposed driveway location down away from the Spill driveway. 

 

Mr. Spill asked about the law.  It was noted that the total acreage is 10.94 acres and is being split into two five acre lots.  He asked if there has to be a certain amount of buildable land on the lot.  The Board indicated that the State Subsurface Regulation requires an area set aside for a house with a 4,000 septic area with a 75 foot well radius. 

 

Mr. Spill stated the driveway is his main concern.

 

James and Jacqueline Michaud – Not Present.

 

Daniel/Johanne Ducheane – Not Present.  Sent letter for the record.  (attached)

 

Richard Ewans – Not Present

 

Richard and Colleen Lalumiere – Present,  stated his concerns had been pretty well hashed over. 

 

John Thalheimer – Not Present.

 

At this point in the meeting, the Board asked Jan VandeBogart how far back on the side of the road he would like to see set aside for road maintenance and repairs.  He noted that he would need as much as possible.  At this point, it was decided that a 20 foot slope easement along the entire frontage of the two lots would be sufficient. 

 

There being no further comment from the public, the public hearing was closed.

 

DECISION – PROPOSED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN THOMAS J. GIOVAGNOLI/JAN VANDEBOGART/DAVID GLANNON ON MORSE ROAD AND TWIST HILL ROAD AND SUBSEQUENT TWO LOT SUBDIVISION OF THOMAS J. GIOVAGNOLI PROPERTY LOCATED ON TWIST HILL ROAD IN THE LOW DENSITY DISTRICT IN DUNBARTON, NH

 

At this point in the meeting, the Chairman noted the following members would be voting on this issue:

 

               James Marcou, Chairman

               Kenneth Swayze

               Alison Vallieres

               George Holt

               Carter Higginbotham

 

MOTION:

 

A motion was made by George Holt that the Dunbarton Planning Board deny the Proposed Lot Line Adjustment Between Thomas J. Giovagnoli/Jan VanDeBogart/David Glannon on Morse Road and Twist Hill Road and Subsequent Two Lot Subdivision of Thomas J. Giovagnoli Property located on Twist Hill Road in the Low Density District in Dunbarton, NH (Lot D6-4-2) for the following reasons:

 

1.      The application does not meet the spirit and intent of the Town of Dunbarton Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision regulations.

 

2.      Does not meet frontage requirements specified in Article 2 – Definitions:  Frontage, “Frontage shall be measured along the common boundary of the front lot line and public street right-of-way on a Class V or better road….Such measurement shall refer to a continuous line except where otherwise specified;”

 

3.      Access restrictions on the Subdivision Plan do not reasonably control access along the 10 (ten) foot access strip.

 

4.      The access strip provides an unnecessary and avoidable nuisance to abutting property owners by concentrating property use along the abutting property owners; and

 

5.      Does not provide reasonable use of the 10 (ten) foot wide access strip of land.

 

Carter Higginbotham seconded the motion. 

 

The motion passed by a majority vote as follows:

 

               Kenneth Swayze – Yes

               George Holt – Yes

               Carter Higginbotham – Yes

               Alison Vallieres – No

 

DECISION – PROPOSED TOM AND CAROL HOGAN TWO LOT SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON ROBERT ROGERS ROAD IN THE LOW DENSITY DISTRICT IN DUNBARTON, NH

 

The Chairman noted the following members would be voting on this issue:

 

               James Marcou, Chairman

               Kenneth Swayze

               Alison Vallieres

               George Holt

               Charles Graybill

 

 

 

MOTION:

 

Kenneth Swayze made a motion that the Dunbarton Planning Board approve the Proposed Tom and Carol Hogan Two Lot Subdivision located on Robert Rogers Road in the Low Density District in Dunbarton, NH (E5-4-3) to include a 20 (twenty) foot slope easement for road construction and maintenance along the entire frontage of the property and to move the driveway 50 (fifty) feet east on the westerly lot. 

 

The motion was seconded by Charles Graybill.

 

The motion passed by a majority with the following vote:

 

               Kenneth Swayze – Yes

               Alison Vallieres – Yes

               Charles Graybill – Yes

               George Holt – Abstained

 

NEW BUSINESS:

 

Jacques Belanger, Surveyor, appeared before the Board and presented a preliminary plan showing a proposed  three lot subdivision of the Richard Zylak property on Ordway Road.  It was noted there is 1,100 feet of road frontage on the property.  Jacques stated the road is a two rod road. 

 

The Board noted they should consider a slope easement for road maintenance issues for the Town.

 

There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m.

 

                                                                                                                        Respectfully submitted,

 

 

                                                                                                                        Alison R. Vallieres

                                                                                                                        Secretary