.

 

TOWN OF DUNBARTON

BOARD OF ASSESSORS

 

NOVEMBER 16, 2004

 

 

 

Present:                      Timothy Terragni, Chairman

                                    John R. Swindlehurst, II

                                    Bryan Clark

 

                                    Bud Noyes, appraiser

                                    Janice VandeBogart, Town Administrator

 

Meeting was called to order at 7PM

 

The minutes of the October 19th meeting were reviewed.  Tim Terragni made the motion to accept the minutes as written.  The motion was seconded by John Swindlehurst, all were in favor and the minutes were signed.

 

The board reviewed and signed the “Equalization – Municipal Assessment Data Sheets” required by the N. H. Department of Revenue to formulate the 2003 ratio for the Town of Dunbarton.  The data sheets were prepared by the Town Administrator and reviewed by the town appraiser.  The form was accepted and signed.

 

Intents to cut timber were received from Kathleen LaFreniere, E3-02-02 and Martha Hammond, E3-01-1,2,3,4,&5.  The board approved both and signed.

 

Abatements were reviewed and accepted for the following:

 

            *  N. H. Traditional Homes.  G4-01-01                                 $1,314.57

                                                             G4-01-12                                $1,493.64

                                                             G4-01-13                                $1,431.30

 

·        Bolton, Francis and Katherine Rhodenizer, K1-01-01:

Bud Noyes explained that this property is waterfront property with restrictions that say that the owner cannot have a septic system, electricity, or water.  This property could not be for residential use. Bud stated that he went to the property to assess it because Mr. Bolton had applied for a building permit for a shed.  He was not aware of the restrictions at the time and assessed the land and building for $54,900.  Mr. Bolton contacted him and mailed him proof of the restrictions and Bud brought the assessment down to $42,050.  He recommended an abatement of $12,850. 

     

John Swindlehurst made the motion to approve the abatement of $12,850 on this lot.  Tim Terragni seconded the motion and all were in favor.

 

Appointments with the public:

 

Ronald Lekebusch:  F2-01-06:  Mr. Lekebusch was present and met with the Board regarding his current assessment.    Bud stated that Mr. Lekebusch’s property was not properly assessed and in his review of all current use properties he discovered an error and made corrections.  Ron admitted that it was his mistake when the current use map was drawn and explained how there was a mix up on the front footage. He said that he and Bud had tried to work this out.  Ron stated that he had noticed a large increase in his value of about $4000 mainly because of the valuation not only because of the increase in the tax rate itself.  He stated that there was a discrepancy as to what was drawn on his current use map and what he was taxed for and agreed that the frontage should have been triangulated.  Bud had re-calculated according to the map. 

 

Bud stated that he had recalculated and came up with a reduction of $31,550 in assessment.  Ron did not agree with Bud’s calculations.  Ron further stated that he felt that he had been paying on 75 ft of frontage and would like to leave it that way.   Ron said he did not agree with Bud’s calculations and Bud stated he would like to leave it to the board.  John Swindlehurst stated that the board will review this and get back to Ron. 

 

Tom Maille, A3-01-03:  Mr. Maille stated that the reason he was here was not because the tax rate went up but because his assessment went up.  He stated that he built a barn in 2002 and put in an in ground pool and believed that he was already being taxed accordingly in 2003 but Bud stated that he was not taxed for the barn or the pool.  He was only being taxed in 2003 for the foundation on the barn.   Bud stated that the paving charge for the driveway was an error and was taken off.  Tom went over the conversation he had with the previous town assessor and he really did believe that he was being taxed last year for the barn and pool.  When he got his tax bill this year he could not believe the increase.   Bud stated that his assessment was not properly done on the land and Bud had made corrections there as well.  Bud gave the example of the driveway and the house lot being essentially taxed as backland.  The driveway had to be assessed as frontage and the house lot value was adjusted as well. 

 

Mr. Maille asked what prompted his lot to be reviewed and adjusted.  The Board stated that Bud Noyes had been asked to review all the current use parcels to correct errors and to update according to a directive from the courts as a result of a recent court decision regarding current use valuation.

 

Ralph Fellbaum,  H2-4-6:  Ralph was concerned about his building values going up $17,000 and he was not sure why.  He stated that his square footage on  his building had changed along with the multiplier per square foot.  He also wanted to know why the assessor had inspected his property this year as he had not  made improvements.  Bud Noyes stated that the card was flagged for a pick up and that was why he went to see it.   Bud went on to say that when he got to the site he discovered that the sketch on the back of the card did not match what was there so he re-measured the building.     He found the square feet to be 2200 sq. ft.  and he used the 1997 manual to calculate the price.  He also found that the garage was not measured correctly and he corrected that as well.  The card had read 2396 sq. ft. and he corrected it to 2200 sq. ft. and used the correct sq. ft. price of $69.   The square footage had been lowered but the assessment was higher because the previous assessor had used $60 per square foot. 

 

Mr. Fellbaum stated that he had a bank do an evaluation on his house to get an equity loan recently.  They used two properties in town ( E2-01-08 and J2-01-13) and he looked at their tax assessments and they are lower than his.  He wanted to know why his was more then their assessments.    Bud Noyes stated he would review these properties but Bud and the board agreed that bank appraisals are not preformed in the same manner as town appraisals for tax purposes.   

 

The Board asked Bud Noyes and Mr. Fellbaum to set up an appointment to review the home together.  Mr. Fellbaum stated that he only had two bathrooms and the card said he had three.  Everyone agreed that the extra bathroom would be removed. 

 

Abatement:  It was brought to the board’s attention that a tax bill had been mailed to the wrong owner of record.  The lot in question was lot K1-04-18, Clara M. Shelton.  The abatement was signed and a warrant to collect taxes from the correct owner, Thomas & LeeAnn Shelton, was signed. 

 

Warrant to collect added taxes:

·        B4-05-21, Bruce and Rebecca Toter:  There was a new home added to this property in 2004 and it was not entered into the computer for tax billing.  This resulted in an added tax of $3,815.01. 

·        B8-01-08, Michael & Heidi Tanner:  An update was made to their assessment by the appraiser and was not entered into the computer.  This resulted in an added tax of $92.86.

 

The warrant was signed and will be passed on to the Tax Collector.

 

Other:   Bud Noyes said he had received a call from Joan and Henry Burnham regarding the assessment on their property, lot B3-02-04 & 4A.   They have finished their home and Bud did an inside appraisal this year.   Bud stated that he put the house in class 5 but gave a depreciation because it is 5 years old and has some signs of rot in places and other problems.  Mrs. Burnham was very concerned about the increase in their assessment.  She would like to talk with the Board about the assessment and to see if they can put more land in current use to help with taxes.  They now have eight acres out of current use and would like to change that to five acres.    The board recommended leaving the assessment alone for now but would be willing to meet with them.

 

The board discussed Ron Lekebusch’s property again.  It was their decision to have Bud Noyes re-check all the figures and let the board know his findings.

 

The board discussed Tom Maille’s property also and decided there would be no change.

 

The board was informed of a request from a resident to review the manual used by the revaluation company for the complete revaluation of the town.  It was noted that the manual is available for viewing at the town office.  Also, a request was made for a list of buildings exempted by the revaluation.  This is contained in the minutes of the Board of Assessors and they are also available at the town office.  The resident will be informed.

 

Motion to adjourn the meeting was passed.

Adjourned at 8:50 pm.

                                                                                    ______________________________ 

                                                                                    Timothy Terragni, Chairman

 

 

                                                                                    ______________________________

                                                                                    John R. Swindlehurst, II

 

 

                                                                                    ______________________________

                                                                                    Bryan Clark

                                                                                    Dunbarton Board of Assessors

Janice VandeBogart,

            Recording Secretary

            Town Administrator